- Write by:
-
Wednesday, November 4, 2020 - 8:02:42 PM
-
652 Visit
-
Print
Mining News Pro - Election day in the US is finally here. The contrast between the presidential candidates could not be greater and there is no issue that makes that clearer than climate change.
Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden has called it an “existential threat” while President Donald Trump has insinuated it’s “a hoax” and is pulling the country out of the Paris climate accords. (America will officially exit the agreement tomorrow, whatever the outcome of the election.)
Many in the environmental community frame the race as one of life or death. “The health of the economy and the fate of the planet absolutely hang in the balance,” said Bracken Hendricks, a former climate adviser to Washington Governor Jay Inslee who helped shape Biden’s pledge to move the country to 100% clean energy by 2035.
One of the overarching differences lies in the future of energy. The Trump administration has made no secret of their enthusiasm for supporting fossil fuels. They have championed the dirtiest of all fuels, coal (albeit unsuccessfully), and they have used government dollars to aid the gas and oil industries whenever possible. Just two examples include cutting dirt-cheap leases for drilling on public lands during the pandemic and offering a stealth bailout to financially flailing firms.
By contrast, in July, Biden announced a $2.2-trillion plan to decarbonise our grid by 2035 and our economy by 2050, which is deeply ambitious by any account. He’s united a wide swath of centrist Democrats, union bosses, environmental activists and clean energy barons. While Trump has been cutting scientists and scientific agencies across the government, the former Vice President wants to spend $400-billion on energy research and innovation. (And if you want a detailed roadmap to how that money should be spent, Varun Sivaram, a senior research scholar at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, has you covered on that.)
If there is one thing environmental activists can be relaxed about, it is that people understand what hangs in the balance: Never before have voters so clearly indicated that they want candidates to act on climate change. Edward Maibach, director of the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication, says voters get it and it is a winning issue. And climate change is an issue all over the country in different ways—not merely represented by the top contest.
“My personal favorite indicator that climate change is on the ballot across America, even in unlikely places, is that the Democratic candidate for the US Senate in Wyoming is a climate scientist, Merav Ben-David—and she’s running a highly competitive race.”
Short Link:
https://www.miningnews.ir/En/News/606963
Australia will spend A$566 million ($373 million) over the coming decade to map out resource deposits with a focus on ...
Equinor on Wednesday said it has entered an agreement with Standard Lithium to acquire a 45% stake in lithium projects ...
Copper briefly traded through $10,000 a ton as investors raised bets on Federal Reserve rate cuts, and Goldman Sachs ...
Albemarle, the world’s largest producer of lithium for electric vehicle batteries, could look at reducing capital ...
Coal India Ltd., the world’s largest producer of the commodity, reported a 26% increase in fourth-quarter profit, driven ...
Emerging North American gold producer Contango ORE is boosting its landhold in Alaska with the acquisition of Canada’s ...
Gold fell, with market watchers saying the previous day’s rally in response to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s ...
The Senate voted Tuesday evening to approve legislation banning the import of enriched uranium from Russia, sending the ...
Canadian miner Barrick Gold on Wednesday beat first-quarter profit estimates on higher bullion prices and said it has ...
No comments have been posted yet ...