- Write by:
-
Wednesday, August 28, 2019 - 10:43:17 AM
-
1315 Visit
-
Print
Mining News Pro - A federal appeals court on Tuesday revived lawsuits by aluminum purchasers that accused Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, mining company Glencore and other companies of conspiring to drive up prices for the metal by reducing supply.
In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said a federal judge erred in dismissing antitrust claims by “direct” purchasers of aluminum such as Novelis, and by other purchasers including Eastman Kodak, Fujifilm and Reynolds Consumer Products.
Purchasers accused banks and commodity trading, mining and metals warehousing companies of conspiring to hoard aluminum inventory earlier this decade, after prices had declined because industrial activity fell during the global financial crisis.
The purchasers said the alleged conspiracy led to delays in processing orders and higher storage costs, ultimately inflating the cost to produce cabinets, flashlights, soft drink cans, strollers and other goods containing aluminum.
Lawyers for the defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Writing for the appeals court, Circuit Judge Pierre Leval said the purchasers could sue because they claimed to suffer harm in a market that the defendants allegedly restrained, the market to buy and sell primary aluminum.
He distinguished them from commercial end users and consumer end users, whose own antitrust claims were rejected by the appeals court in an August 2016 decision because their claimed injuries were too far removed from the alleged misconduct.
Leval faulted U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest, who has since returned to private practice, for relying on that decision to conclude that any manipulation would have occurred in the warehousing market, not the primary aluminum market.
Unlike the end users, “whose injury was an incidental byproduct of the defendants’ alleged violation, these plaintiffs’ injuries were a direct result of the defendants’ anticompetitive conduct,” Leval wrote.
The cases were returned to the federal court in Manhattan, where they are now overseen by U.S. District Judge Denise Cote.
“We’re pretty excited,” Patrick Coughlin, a lawyer for the direct purchasers, said in an interview.
“Even if manipulation took place in another market, if it were directed toward our clients’ markets and inflated the price of aluminum there, we should be able to bring an antitrust case,” he added. “We’re ready to go to trial.”
Lawyers for Kodak and Fujifilm, and a lawyer for Reynolds, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Short Link:
https://www.miningnews.ir/En/News/416240
Australian miner Lynas posted a slump in third-quarter sales revenue on Wednesday, missing analyst expectations on the ...
Zimbabwe’s President Emmerson Mnangagwa has re-appointed Winston Chitando as the southern African nation’s mines ...
Australia’s Fortescue on Wednesday logged a larger-than-expected decline in third-quarter iron ore shipments, following ...
The London Metal Exchange is imposing new rules surrounding the movement of metal in its warehousing network, taking aim ...
Canada has granted Airbus a waiver to allow it to use Russian titanium in its manufacturing after becoming the first ...
A Russian arbitration court ruled on Monday that four units of Swiss commodities trader Glencore will pay more than 11.4 ...
A Native American group has asked all members of a US appeals court on Monday to overturn an earlier ruling that granted ...
The London Metal Exchange (LME) on Saturday banned from its system Russian metal produced on or after April 13 to comply ...
The world’s coal-fired power capacity grew 2% last year, its highest annual increase since 2016, driven by new builds in ...
No comments have been posted yet ...